Bibliographie

Vous trouverez ci-desous une bibliographie annotée de références utiles concernant le pluralisme en économie et en sciences en général, ainsi que sur l’usage des valeurs en économie.

1. Appels pour plus de pluralisme

Cambridge 27. 2001. ‘Opening Up Economics’. Post-Autistic Economics Newsletter, no. 7 (July).
L’appel d’étudiants de Cambridge.

Hodgson, Geoffrey M., Uskali Mäki, and Deirdre N. McCloskey. 1992. ‘Plea for a Pluralistic and Rigorous Economics’. American Economic Review 82 (2): xxv.
L’appel d’économistes influents (dont 4 prix Nobel)

Sent, Esther-Mirjam. 2003. ‘Pleas for Pluralism’. Post-Autistic Economics Review, no. 18. http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/pluralism/Sent18.htm.
Un regard critique sur ces appels.

2. Sur la définition du Pluralisme:

En méthodologie de l’économie:

Caldwell, Bruce. 1982. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. London: Allen and Unwin.

Davis, John B. 1994. ‘Pluralism in Social Economics’. History of Economic Ideas 2 (3): 119–28.

Davis, John. 2014. « ‘Pluralism’ In Economics? A Symposium ». Review of Political Economy 26 (4): 477‑78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2014.950462.

Dow, Sheila C. 1997. « Methodological pluralism and pluralism of method ». In Pluralism in economics: new perspectives in history and methodology, édité par Andrea Salanti et Ernesto Screpanti, 90‑99. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

———. 2001. « Methodology in a pluralist environment ». Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1): 33‑40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780010022811.

———. 2002. Economic methodology: an inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2004. « Structured pluralism ». Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3): 275‑90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178042000252965.

Quelques tentatives de définitions:

Dutt, Amitava Krishna. 2014. ‘Dimensions of Pluralism in Economics’. Review of Political Economy 26 (4): 479–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2014.950461.

Garnett Jr, Robert F. 2006. « Paradigms and pluralism in heterodox economics ». Review of Political Economy 18 (4): 521‑46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538250600915725.

Lee, Frederic S. 2011. ‘The Pluralism Debate in Heterodox Economics’. Review of Radical Political Economics 43 (4): 540–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613411402643.

Mäki, Uskali. 1997. ‘The One World and the Many Theories’. In Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology, edited by Andrea Salanti and Ernesto Screpanti, 37–47. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

Salanti, Andrea, and Ernesto Screpanti, eds. 1997. Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

Sent, Esther-Mirjam. 2009. ‘Pluralism’. In Handbook of Economics and Ethics, edited by Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren, 358–65. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/4252_47.html.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2004. « Explanatory pluralism in economics: against the mainstream? » Philosophical Explorations 7 (3): 299‑315. https://doi.org/10.1080/1386979042000258376.

———. 2005. « Towards a Framework for Pluralism in Economics ». post-autistic economics review 31 (article 3). http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue30/VanBouwel30.htm.

3. Arguments pour le pluralisme

De Langhe, Rogier. 2010. « Why Should I Adopt Pluralism? » In Economic Pluralism, édité par Robert F. Garnett Jr, Erik K. Olsen, et Martha Starr, 87‑98. Abingdon: Routledge.

Elster, Jon. 2011. « Hard and Soft Obscurantism in the Humanities and Social Sciences ». Diogenes 58 (1‑2): 159‑70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192112444984.

———. 2016. « Obscurantisme et liberté de l’enseignement et de la recherche ». Commentaire 39 (153): 139‑49.

Fullbrook, Edward, ed. 2008. Pluralist Economics. London: Zed Books.

Garnett Jr, Robert F., Erik K. Olsen, and Martha Starr, eds. 2010. Economic Pluralism. Abingdon: Routledge.

Gräbner, Claudius. 2017. ‘The Complexity of Economies and Pluralism in Economics’. ICAE Working Paper Series 69. Linz: ICAE.

Gräbner, Claudius, and Birte Strunk. 2018. ‘Pluralism in Economics: Its Critiques and Their Lessons’. ICAE Working Paper Series 82. Linz: ICAE.

King, J. E. 2008. « Three Arguments for pluralism ». In Pluralist Economics, édité par Edward Fullbrook, 111‑16. London: Zed Books.

4. Critiques du Pluralisme

Colander, David C. 2010. « Moving beyond the rhetoric of pluralism ». In Economic Pluralism, édité par Robert F. Garnett Jr, Erik K. Olsen, et Martha Starr, 36‑47. Abingdon: Routledge.

Colander, David C. 2014. « The Wrong Type of Pluralism: Toward a Transdisciplinary Social Science ». Review of Political Economy 26 (4): 516‑25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2014.950460.

Davidson, Paul. 2004. « A Response to King’s Argument for Pluralism ». Post-Autistic Economics Review 24 (article 1). http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue24/Davidson24.htm.

5. Sur la différence entre hétérodoxe/orthodoxe

Arnsperger, Christian, and Yanis Varoufakis. 2006. ‘What Is Neoclassical Economics? The Three Axioms Responsible for Its Theoretical Oeuvre, Practical Irrelevance and, Thus, Discursive Power’. Panoeconomicus 53 (1): 5–18.

Davis, John B. 2006. ‘The Turn in Economics: Neoclassical Dominance to Mainstream Pluralism?’ Journal of Institutional Economics 2 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137405000263.

Weintraub, E. Roy. 2002. ‘Neoclassical Economics’. The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/NeoclassicalEconomics.html.

6. Sur la domination du mainstream

Demsetz, Harold. 1997. ‘THE PRIMACY OF ECONOMICS: AN EXPLANATION OF THE COMPARATIVE SUCCESS OF ECONOMICS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES’. Economic Inquiry 35 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1997.tb01890.x.

Fourcade, Marion, Etienne Ollion, and Yann Algan. 2015. ‘The Superiority of Economists’. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (1): 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.1.89.

Heckman, James J., and Sidharth Moktan. 2018. ‘The Tyranny of the Top Five Journals’. Institute for New Economic Thinking. https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/the-tyranny-of-the-top-five-journals.

Lazear, Edward P. 2000. ‘Economic Imperialism’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (1): 99–146. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554683.

Mäki, Uskali. 2009. ‘Economics Imperialism: Concept and Constraints’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3): 351–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393108319023.

Mäki, Uskali, Adrian Walsh, and Manuela Fernández Pinto, eds. 2018. Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity. Routledge Studies in Science, Technology and Society 36. London: Routledge.

Stigler, George J. 1984. ‘Economics: The Imperial Science?’ The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 86 (3): 301–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/3439864.

7. Sur l’usage des valeurs en économie

Colander, David, and Huei-Chun Su. 2015. ‘Making Sense of Economists’ Positive-Normative Distinction’. Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (2): 157–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2015.1024877.

Larue, Louis, and Thomas M. Mueller, eds. 2018. La Normativité En Science Économique. Special Issue of Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Vol. 116 (2). Louvain: Peeters.

Mongin, Philippe. 1999. ‘Normes et Jugements de Valeur En Économie Normative’. Social Science Information/Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales 38: 521–53.

Myrdal, Gunnar. 1953. The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory. Translated by Paul Streeten. International Library of Sociology and Social Reconstruction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Myrdal, Gunnar. 1958. Value in Social Theory: A Selection of Essays on Methodology. Translated by Paul Streeten. International Library of Sociology and Social Reconstruction. London: Routledge.

Myrdal, Gunnar. 1974. Against the Stream: Critical Essays on Economics. London: MacMillan.

Putnam, Hilary. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

Putnam, Hilary, and Vivian Walsh, eds. 2012. The End of Value-Free Economics. Abingdon: Routledge.

….et en science en général

Claveau, François, et Anthony Voisard. 2018. « Experts et valeurs: usages (il)légitimes? » In Experts, sciences et sociétés, édité par François Claveau et Julien Prud’homme, 237‑56. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.

Kuhn, Thomas S.. 1977. « Objectivity, value judgment and theory choice ». In The essential tension: selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Longino, Helen. 2004. « How Values Can Be Good for Science ». In Science, values, and objectivity, édité par Peter K. Machamer et Gereon Wolters, 127‑42. Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science. Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press.

8. Pluralisme en philosophie des sciences

Chang, Hasok. 2012. Is Water H2O?: Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Springer Netherlands. //www.springer.com/fr/book/9789400739314.

Chang, Hasok. 2017. ‘Is There Room for Pluralism in Science?’ Yale University, April 17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zodSx_5geA.

Feyerabend, Paul K. 1975. Against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: NLB.

Kellert, Stephen, Helen E. Longino, and C. Kenneth Waters, eds. 2006. Scientific Pluralism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2078/ebook:113306.

Longino, Helen E. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

Marchionni, Caterina. 2008. ‘Explanatory Pluralism and Complementarity : From Autonomy to Integration’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3): 314–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393108319399.